Monday, January 9, 2023

From Medieval Corruption to Contemporary Environmentalism: Paying Others for Your Sins

 Prior to the Protestant Reformation, many European Christians believed that they could buy their way out of punishment in the afterlife. It was reputed that some sellers of indulgences used the jingle, “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs.”

As much as that was a caricature of Christian faith, there were worse practices.

One of them was “proxy penance,” a process in medieval times by which “a powerful man, rich in friends” could avoid his own punishment by paying other people to take on his penance. ...

... We may laugh at such medieval practices until we realise that, in our supposedly enlightened society, we are doing the same thing.

We are told that we can cover up our “environmental sins” by purchasing carbon credits, by paying special taxes and levies, and by sending our waste off for recycling.... 

To read more, please see my article at the Epoch Times, via this link. 

 https://www.theepochtimes.com/from-medieval-corruption-to-contemporary-environmentalism-paying-others-for-your-sins_4971022.html 

Monday, October 31, 2022

Netball Australia Players Should Consider Their Own History Before Virtue Signalling

Netball Australia Players Should Consider Their Own History Before Virtue Signalling

My latest article is published by the Epoch Times, Australia.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/netball-australia-players-should-consider-their-own-history-before-virtue-signalling_4830468.html 

A wise Rabbi from Nazareth once said you should take the plank out of your own eye before you attend to the speck in another’s. It is a principle that Australian Netball should have remembered in its recent controversy over Hancock Prospecting and its, now former, sponsorship of the Australian Netball team.

A number of players took issue with Hancock Prospecting, the opinions of Gina Rinehart about climate change, and in particular, a statement Lang Hancock (Rinehart’s father) made in 1984 about sterilising and breeding out Aboriginal people.

The debacle cast a shadow over what should have been a celebration with the imminent debut of a player who would have been the first Indigenous member of the national team in 25 years and the third ever.

However, even that cause for celebration raised a serious question. If Wallam was only the third indigenous player on the national team ever, what is Australian Netball’s record on Aboriginal participation? The answer is not encouraging.

About four percent of those involved in Australian netball are Indigenous. But the high level of grassroots participation does not result in elite and representative participation. In fact, only three Indigenous players have made the national team, called the Diamonds, in almost a century of Australian netball.

Discrimination in the Highest Level of Competition

Sharon Finnan-White, the second Indigenous member of the Diamonds, has alleged there is a bias against Aboriginal players and an allegedly racist culture that has prevented Indigenous players from rising up through the pathways for elite players.

She alleged of Fox Sports that: “A lot of our players haven‘t been able to get into the pathway because of unconscious bias and stereotyping and racism.” .......

To read the rest of the article please click on this link https://www.theepochtimes.com/netball-australia-players-should-consider-their-own-history-before-virtue-signalling_4830468.html

Thursday, October 13, 2022

Freedom for me, but not for thee

The good people at the Dawson Centre in Hobart have published my commentary on the Essendon Football Club scandal. 

I discuss double-standards applied to Christians and others, the deeper issues, and how I think the scandal will backfire on Dan Andrews. He has backed himself into a corner from which it will be hard to extract himself.

Thank you, Dr David Daintree and the team at Dawson! 


Freedom for me, but not for thee






Thursday, August 11, 2022

EDUCATION AS A BULWARK AGAINST TERRORISM?

Does the recent killing of Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri mean the end of that terrorist movement? I think not, given that Al Qaeda remained a serious threat and cursed the world with the Islamic State movement. 

Religiously motivated terrorism, whether it claims an affiliation with Islam, Christianity, or any other faith, relies neither on strength of numbers nor on individual leaders, but on powerful ideologies. That point was made very clear to me when I watched an interrogation of a failed suicide bomber and listened to an experienced CIA agent.  When he was asked how he felt about his mission, which was to kill innocent women, children, and men, the suicide bomber’s chilling response was, ‘I knew it was wrong, but my commander told me it was the will of God.’ ......

To read more, and how I think religiously motivated terrorism can be defeated in the long term, please read the full article at the The Christopher Dawson Centre for Cultural Studies  https://www.dawsoncentre.org/newsletter/prof-matthew-ogilvie-education-vs-terrorism/ 


Thank you to Dr David Daintree and the Dawson Centre for publishing my article!






Thursday, June 23, 2022

People of Faith in Politics

The Record, Magazine of the Catholic Archdiocese of Perth, has kindly published my article "People of Faith in Politics: Being a Light to the Nations"

One key point in the article is that people of faith in politics are often associated with particular issues, whether they are protection of life (such as abortion and euthanasia), economic justice (such as tax policy, welfare, and family support), education, and cultural issues.

But faith perspectives can run much deeper than this or that issue. Dr David Furse-Roberts has written an excellent book God & Menzies, The Faith that Shaped a Prime Minister and his Nation. Rather than faith being a matter of "issues" for Sir Robert Menzies, faith was instead the very foundation of his worldview and his perspective that formed his approach to liberty, human rights and the very foundations of Australian culture.


Further Reading:

Friday, April 8, 2022

The Catholic Answer to Cancel Culture: “Be Not Afraid!”

 This week, the Record published my article, The Church’s Answer to Cancel Culture: “Be Not Afraid!” 

Cancel Culture


The article explains how, despite serious mistakes in the past, including its dreadful treatment of Galileo, Catholic thought has grown to a point where, instead of fear-filled repression, Catholic thinkers are encouraged to "be not afraid." We are encouraged to confront our adversaries, not with our own cancel culture, but with a higher and more robust truth.

Our heroes in this intellectual tradition are:
  • St John Henry Newman, who responded to modernity, not by repressing other voices, but by mastering their “tools” and turning the weapons of those who assailed Catholic doctrine against them -- and to then use that learning to support our beliefs.
  • St John Paul II, who declared that “Truth Cannot Contradict Truth.” https://www.vaticanobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/JPII-Truth-Cannot-Contradict-Truth.pdf 
  • The Jesuit Philosophy Professor, Fr Tom Daly, who defined truth as "that which stands up to persistent questions." That is, truth does not hide behind a cancel culture, but it stands out in the open. Truth is bold and confident.
John Paul also makes another important point (in Ex Corde Ecclesiae) . The Catholic tradition is not only committed to truth, but it is confident in "already knowing the fount of truth." In the article, I argue that too many secular people lack faith in "the fount of all truth" and, lacking confidence, they have to resort to cancelling.

I also mentioned very interesting research by Rachel Wahl, who "found that the evangelical students displayed a greater ability to listen to and learn from their peers across the political (and religious) divide than did their secular peers."

I'd like to throw down the gauntlet, first to radical secularists who seem so timid about their version of the truth that they have to resort to cancelling their opponents. But secondly, I'd like to also challenge my fellow-Catholics, or other people of faith, who similarly lack confidence in the truth and believe that we should be engaged in censorship and heresy hunts. That's not the best part of our tradition, and it never was.

------------------------------------------------

For more reading:

Matthew Ogilvie, "The Church’s Answer to Cancel Culture: 'Be Not Afraid!"” The Record, 4 April 2022. https://therecord.com.au/news/the-record-magazine/the-churchs-answer-to-cancel-culture-be-not-afraid/ 


    
Emily G. Wenneborg , "Faith Commitments Fuel Dialogue Across Differences," Heterodox Academy Blog, August 4 2021 https://heterodoxacademy.org/blog/faith-commitments-fuel-dialogue-across-differences/

-----------------------------

Image Credits
Cancel Culture, by August Meriwether,  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:August_Meriwether 


Friday, August 20, 2021

Jacinda Ardern’s Naivete is No Match for Taliban Fanaticism

(Warning: Distressing graphic images below)

NZ PM Jacinda Ardern


Some silly things have been said this week in response to the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan. New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern’s appeal to the Taliban was one of the worst and probably deserves a gold medal for naivete.

Ardern called on the Taliban to respect the “human rights and the safety of their people.” She also asked them to care for “the wellbeing of women and girls.”

She said some other things that made it sound like she was trying to recruit Taliban members into the warm politically correct embrace of the New Zealand Labor Party.

Ardern is certainly not alone. A Professor at McGill University called on the UN to ensure that the Taliban respect women and girls, include women in peace negotiations, and make an enduring commitment to women’s rights.

Ardern and the Professor are well-intentioned. No reasonable and ethical person could disagree with wanting to uphold women’s rights. The problem is that they are preaching to the choir - but the Taliban are nowhere near the church.

The Taliban make clear what they think of women's rights.



The sad reality is that the Taliban have an intellectual, moral, and religious horizon so alien to our own intellectual tradition, that people cannot understand them from a Western mindset. It also means that when Westerners appeal to human rights, reason, and ethical responsibility, the Taliban either have no idea of what they are talking about, or the Taliban think that the Westerners are very stupid.

Westerners have previously made the same mistake with al-Qaeda, the so-called "Islamic State" and other Muslim fanatic groups. Too often they have not realized that we operate out of mutually exclusive horizons.

The Western intellectual tradition has a particular view of the dignity of the human person and individual rights. It has a view about reason, rationality and ethics and the responsible conscience of the human person. It also has a particular view about God. Whether we believe in God or not, we have an image of what God should be.

Those beliefs and our intellectual horizon are simply not shared by the Taliban and other extremists. To give a few key examples:

On reason and rationality: Just like their Christian fundamentalist counterparts, the Taliban do not trust people to know the truth for themselves. They over-emphasise parts of the Koran such as “Allah knows, while you do not know.” (Koran 2:216)

On morality: In extremist Islam, there is no ethics, only law. People are not meant to come to decisions of rational conscience, but instead to submit their moral responsibility to a superior. To give an example, a failed suicide bomber I once saw interviewed said "I knew it was wrong, but my commander said it was the will of God."

On the nature of God: Pope Benedict was right when he distinguished the God of fanaticism from the God worshipped in more authentic Abrahamic faiths. Pope Benedict spoke of a God who is reasonable and good. But he also pointed to the “voluntarist” God worshipped by fanatics like the Taliban. The Taliban’s God is not bound by what is rational, or what is good. Their God only issues commands. And whether people's conscience tells them it is good, reasonable, or not, those commands are law.

On the human person: In the West, we take it for granted that all people are valuable. We are held to be equal in dignity and endowed with certain rights. That's not part of the Taliban horizon. For them, humans don't have inherent dignity, and so we don't have inalienable rights

Thus, the Taliban’s intellectual and moral horizon is completely different from ours. When we talk about human rights, dignity, and equality, these things make no sense to the Taliban – and Ardern is culpably naïve to believe that any appeal to human rights will make a difference to the Taliban.

Taliban beating a woman in public.


The only thing the Taliban understands from the West is force and strength. Right now, they have been emboldened because they believe we have neither.

It’s for those reasons that diplomacy and appeals to human rights will not work on the Taliban right now. In the short to medium term, only force will work.  

Long term, we can only hope that fanatics like the Taliban have their intellectual enlightenment and come to appreciate liberal values, such as reason and moral responsibility.

Until then, we should no more expect the Taliban to respect women’s rights than we should expect a bull not to charge at us just because we’re vegetarian.







-----------------------------------------------------


Image Credits:

Jacinda Ardern in Dunedin.  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacinda_Ardern_in_Dunedin.jpg

November 1999 public execution in Kabul of a mother of five ... http://www.rawa.org/zarmeena.htm 

Taliban religious police beating a woman in Kabul on 26 August 2001 http://rawa.org/beating.htm (archived) 

Let’s abandon the cult of Net Zero

  "While Australia’s commitment to Net Zero has close to net zero impact on the world, it is destroying our economic base." Net Ze...