Skip to main content

Food for thought from Aristotle on Friendship

Aristotle uses the word “philia” for friendship, but he notes that there are three sorts of friendship.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#/media/File:Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg


 

The first is “friendship” of utility, It’s where you use someone to get something from them and they use us to get something.

So, I can be “friends” with a car dealer. I get a car from him, he gets my money.

 

The second is common interests.

So I can be “friends” with people on my football team, my political party or my workmates.

 

The third and highest form of friendship is that which fosters virtue.

This is where two people live for the good of each other and make each other better people.

So, in my most important friendship, my wife makes me a better employee, she encourages me to be better at sport and she makes me a better friend to other people.

 

Aristotle provides a powerful set of criteria for evaluating “friendships.”

 

*Is this person “friends” with me because they get something from me? If that’s all there is, the person is not a true friend, but someone who exploits you.


*Is this person “friends” with me because we do things together? This friendship is OK, but not the best form of friendship. It’s also temporary and contingent. It's not enduring.


*Does this person make me better? Do they encourage me to get better grades, to participate better in sports, to do better at work, do they encourage me to have healthy relationships with others, and do they encourage me to excel in all my pursuits? This is the deepest and best form of friendship and it is the friendship that endures.


How would you categorise your own friendships?

Popular posts from this blog

New Gun Laws Will Impact Freedom of Speech and Thought

Free speech and freedom of thought are at the bedrock of our democratic society, so it is outrageous that the Bill could challenge them.   " The Firearms Bill 2024 before Western Australia’s (WA) state Parliament is a wolf in sheep’s clothing that will violate the rights of all citizens. The Bill will effectively legislate away a person’s right to silence, and their property rights. It presumes guilt by association, discriminates on the basis of health or disability, and challenges the right to free speech and freedom of opinion. " "... the Firearms Bill’s Section 368 threatens any person with a fine if they do not “answer any question asked by a police officer under this Act.. this applies to all people, not only firearms owners, and would therefore, strip them of their right to silence. " " Section 150 allows the WA police commissioner to have regard to “the person’s views, opinions and attitudes. Free speech and freedom of thought are at the bedrock of ou...

"Pharisees of the New Age: Environmentalists and How They Went Wrong."

 I have written a piece for the Dawson Centre, titled,  Pharisees of the New Age:  Environmentalists and How They Went Wrong.  It's in the centre's newsletter (about 1/2 way down the page). I wrote it after it struck me that both the environmental and Pharisee movements started out with good intentions but they became corrupted and they neglected their original mission. https://www.dawsoncentre.org/newsletter/summer-schools-2023/

Catching up with these great Australian women

It was an absolute honour to catch up with these great Australians,  Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price  and  Trish Botha - Liberal for the Senate .  With leaders like these, our country is in safe hands!